UPA Home
     
     
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
     
 

Poster #6: Developing Guidelines for Judging the Cost and Benefit of Fixing Usability Problems

When we conduct an expert analysis, we evaluate an interface for usability problems and then prioritize those problems according to importance (i.e., how important it is from the users’ and client’s perspective to fix the problems) and difficulty (i.e., how difficult it is from the designers’ and developers’ perspective to fix the problems). By mapping the cost and benefit involved in fixing problems, we essentially give clients a sense for the return-on-investment (ROI) they could gain by addressing the problems. When we presented our method at usability and human-computer interaction conferences, the question we were most asked was, “How do you determine the benefit to users, and the cost to developers, of fixing problems with a product?” This poster represents our first pass at outlining the guidelines we use to judge importance and difficulty.