![]() |
|||
|
|||
A printable version of the Call for Participation, tailored for tutorials, is available. Tutorials are formally prepared half-day, full-day, or two-day sessions at which instructors teach conference participants specific usability or design skills. Session sizes range from 10 to 100 participants. One-third to one-half of each session must involve audience participation. For 2004, we invite new submissions as well as repeat submissions from previous years and encourage a variety of state-of-the-art topics on different products. UPA pays an honorarium to tutorial instructors. If a tutorial has two or more instructors, the honorarium will be shared among them (unless otherwise arranged). Honoraria are awarded as follows: When tutorial enrollment falls below a break-even point (which may be in the general range of 5 to 10 participants), the tutorial may be subject to cancellation by UPA. If there is a minimum number of participants needed for an effective tutorial (perhaps a minimum needed to complete exercises), your submission should indicate acceptable minimums, and we will monitor this and keep you posted. UPA provides printed copies of your tutorial booklet for participants. UPA does not cover expenses for any other instructional materials, such as exercises and handouts. All submissions must include two documents: a description with examples of presentation and handout materials, and background information about the instructor(s). Please use the UPA-provided templates to prepare these documents. In addition, you will complete forms online with additional information when you submit your tutorial. See the section “Submitting Your Proposal” for additional information. 1. Description of Tutorial (4 pages minimum, 10 pages maximum, plus a representative example of handouts, e.g. 6-10 slides embedded in the proposal or a bullet-point list with brief description of the content of the slides and handouts. 1MB maximum file size) Your Description should include the following: · Indicate the duration of your proposed tutorial. 2. Your Background In a separate document, describe in one or two paragraphs the relevant background and experience of each instructor, including instructor names and their affiliated organizations. Background description should not exceed 150 words for each person. This description will be used in all published information about the tutorial. To facilitate the blind review process, the background document of your submission will not be sent to the review panel. Some information from the submission process (e.g., keywords, audience, etc.) will also be provided to reviewers. To keep your identity confidential: During the online submission process, you will fill out a series of forms that ask for additional information. Several of these questions will help UPA classify the audience and subject matter for your tutorial. Please be sure to read the section, “Preparing Your Submission” before submitting your tutorial proposal. UPA will evaluate tutorial proposals on the basis of their anticipated benefit for prospective participants and on their fit in the tutorial program as a whole. Factors to be considered include relevance, appeal to the UPA audience, suitability for presentation within a tutorial framework, uniqueness of point of view or methodology, and use of presentation methods that afford participants with hands-on experience of the material being taught. If this tutorial has been taught at previous conferences, past reviews will also be taken into consideration. 1. System, product, or project focus: Do you agree with the submitter’s system, product, or project focus? 2. Topic category: Do you agree with the submitter’s topic category? 3. Topic keywords: Do you agree with the submitter’s keywords? 4. Importance: How important do you think this topic is to the conference? 5. Practicality: How likely is it that people will get useful tips and tricks that they can take back with them? 6. Value to attendees: Will the session provide direct benefits that attendees can apply immediately to their jobs? 7. Originality/Novelty: How original or new is this topic to UPA members? Novelty is an “added value” for submission topics; UPA recognizes that established topics continue to be important to the UPA membership, and that new insights and new perspectives often come from re-examination of established issues. If this tutorial has been offered before at UPA or other conferences, is there any modification made since? Would the modification be an added value to the tutorial for UPA participants? 8. Practitioners: Is the session aimed at practitioners? Does it emphasize how? 9. Interactivity: Will the session be interactive enough to stimulate interest and involvement? Are practical and valuable exercises or activities sufficiently included in this tutorial? Is the proposed group size for practical exercises realistic? 10. Audience: How effectively does the submitter address the needs of his or her targeted audience? See the section “Target Audiences.” 11. Speaker’s Background: Does the instructor(s)’ background indicate appropriate expertise in the topic to teach this material? Do the instructor(s) have sufficient experience in presenting or teaching? In what way will the instructor(s)’ background contribute to the quality of their tutorial? How much experience does the instructor(s) have with the presentation delivery of this tutorial topic? 12. Overall Assessment: Your overall recommendation. As a submitter, you will receive anonymous reviewers’ comments in response to these questions. UPA provides templates both for tutorial submissions and for biographical information. These templates guide you through the process of building a submission that will describe your material in a way that will help both you and your reviewers to evaluate your submission against the review questions. We strongly urge you to use these templates. Some examples of outstanding submissions from past years are available. Reviewing these examples will give you some insight about what makes a strong submission, and what kinds of things that UPA reviewers look for. Thank you to –Ellen Story, Kate Gomoll and Sarah Agarwal for permission to use these examples. After Your Tutorial is Accepted
|
|||
|
|||